A Reconsideration of the Status of Newton's Laws

In Michael J. Shaffer & Michael L. Veber, What Place for the A Priori? Open Court. pp. 177 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I look at the debates of the status of Newton's laws, whether they can each, or all together be considered emprical or a priori.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Laws in Physics.Mathias Frisch - 2014 - European Review 22:S33-S49.
The Third Law in Newton's Mechanics.Roderick W. Home - 1968 - British Journal for the History of Science 4 (1):39-51.
Kant’s Proof of the Law of Inertia.Kenneth Westphal - 1995 - In Hoke Robinson, Proceedings of the 8th International Kant Congress. Marquette University Press. pp. 413-424.
Animals versus the Laws of Inertia.R. F. Hassing - 1992 - Review of Metaphysics 46 (1):29 - 61.
Newton's “law-first” epistemology and “matter-first” metaphysics.Caleb Hazelwood - 2023 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 101 (C):40-47.
The Laws of Motion from Newton to Kant.Eric Watkins - 1997 - Perspectives on Science 5 (3):311-348.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-02

Downloads
31 (#776,157)

6 months
1 (#1,580,527)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David J. Stump
University of San Francisco

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references