An Objection to Swinburne’s Argument for Dualism

Faith and Philosophy 13 (3):405-412 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Swinburne's Argument for Dualism.Thomas W. Smythe - 1994 - Faith and Philosophy 11 (1):127-133.
Swinburne’s Are We Bodies or Souls?William Hasker - 2021 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 69 (1):67-82.
A Critique of Thomistic Dualism.William Hasker - 2018 - In Jonathan J. Loose, Angus John Louis Menuge & J. P. Moreland (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Substance Dualism. Oxford, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 123–131.
Varieties of Dualism: Swinburne and Aquinas.Jason T. Eberl - 2010 - International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (1):39-56.
Reply to Stump and Kretzmann.Richard Swinburne - 1996 - Faith and Philosophy 13 (3):413-414.
Taking consciousness seriously: A defense of cartesian dualism.Frank B. Dilley - 2004 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 55 (3):135-153.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
814 (#29,329)

6 months
146 (#30,918)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eleonore Stump
Saint Louis University

Citations of this work

Substance Dualism and Disembodied Existence.Nicholas Everitt - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (3):333-347.
Swinburne’s Modal Argument for Dualism.William Hasker - 1998 - Faith and Philosophy 15 (3):366-370.
Different Arguments, Same Problems. Modal ambiguity and tricky substitutions.Rafal Urbaniak - 2017 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 13 (2):5-22.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Hard-type soft facts.John Martin Fischer - 1986 - Philosophical Review 95 (4):591-601.

Add more references