Facts, Values, and Morality [Book Review]

Philosophical Review 107 (4):612 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Richard Brandt's last book discusses foundational questions in metaethics and normative ethics. Many of the central views expressed, as well as the topics taken up, will be familiar to those who know Brandt's earlier works, although some parts of the book represent new and welcome additions to his corpus. Brandt was very much a systematic moral philosopher, a theory builder. I can here only sketch the outlines of the theory he developed in the book, and suggest some points at which one might wish to demur.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,060

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Facts, values, and morality.Richard B. Brandt - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brandt, RB-Facts, Values and Morality.J. Shand - 1998 - Philosophical Books 39:262-263.
Morality, utilitarianism, and rights.Richard B. Brandt - 1992 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ethics.[author unknown] - 2008 - Philosophical Books 39 (4):260-266.
Morality, Normativity, and Society.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1996 - Philosophical Review 105 (4):552.
7. The Rationale Behind Surgery –Truth, Facts, Values.Arnaldo Benini - 2014 - In Christoph Lumer (ed.), Morality in Times of Naturalising the Mind. Boston ; Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 195-202.
Brandt's questions about emotive ethics.Charles L. Stevenson - 1950 - Philosophical Review 59 (4):528-534.
Whose Rationality? Which Cognitive Psychotherapy?Bradley N. Seeman - 2004 - International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2):201-222.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
57 (#374,703)

6 months
10 (#394,677)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sarah Stroud
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Citations of this work

Truth is not (Very) Intrinsically Valuable.Chase B. Wrenn - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (1):108-128.
Indicator Reliabilism.James Chase - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (1):115-137.
Seeing reasons.Jennifer Church - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (3):638-670.
Consequentialism or deontology?Georg Spielthenner - 2005 - Philosophia 33 (1):217-235.
How Should I Be? A Defense of Platonic Rational Egoism.Jyl Gentzler - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):39-67.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references