Yehoshua Bar-Hillel. Comments on ‘Degree of confirmation’ by Professor K. R. Popper. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , pp. 155–157. - Karl R. Popper. ‘Content’ and ‘degree of confirmation’: A reply to Dr Bar-Hillel. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , pp. 157–163. - Rudolf Carnap. Remarks on Popper's note on content and degree of confirmation. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 7 , pp. 243–244. - K. R. Popper. Reply to Professor Carnap. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 7 , pp. 244–245. - Y. Bar-Hillel. Further comments on probability and confirmation. A rejoinder to Professor Popper. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 7 , pp. 245–248. - K.R.Popper. Adequacy and consistency: A second reply to Dr Bar-Hillel. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 7 , pp. 249–256. - Peter Achinstein. The identity hypothesis. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, [Book Review]

Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (1):142-146 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2270119

Other Versions

original Stopes-Roe, Harry V. (1968) "[Omnibus Review]". Journal of Symbolic Logic 33(1):142-146

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Popper Karl R.. Degree of confirmation. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 5 , pp. 143–149.Popper K. R.. Errata and corrigenda. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 5 , p. 359. [REVIEW]John G. Kemeny - 1955 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (3):304-305.
‘Content’ and ‘Degree of Confirmation’: A Reply to Dr Bar-Hillel.Karl R. Popper - 1955 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6 (22):157-163.
Karl R. Popper. Two autonomous axiom systems for the calculus of probabilities. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , pp. 51–57. - K. R. Popper. Errata. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , p. 176. - K. R. Popper. Corrigendum. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , p. 351. [REVIEW]John G. Kemeny - 1958 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (3):349-349.
Comments on 'degree of confirmation' by professor K. R. Popper.Yehoshua Bar-Hillel - 1955 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6 (22):155-157.
Comments on `Degree of Confirmation' by Professor K. R. Popper.Jerusalem Bar-Hillel - 1955 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6 (22):155.
Hugues Leblanc. On so-called degrees of confirmation. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 10 pp. 312–315. - K. R. Popper. Probabilistic independence and corroboration by empirical tests. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 10 pp. 315–318. [REVIEW]Harry V. Stopes-Roe - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (1):146.
David Miller. A paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 59–61. - Karl R. Popper. A comment on Miller's new paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 61–69. - Karl R. Popper. A paradox of zero information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 141–143. - J. L. Mackie. Miller's so-called paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 144–147. - David Miller. On a so-called so-called paradox: a reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 147–149. - Jeffrey Bub and Michael Radner. Miller's paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 1 , pp. 63–67. - David Miller. The straight and narrow rule of induction: a reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 145. [REVIEW]Richard C. Jeffrey - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127.
Alexander H. G.. The paradoxes of confirmation. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 9 , pp. 227–233.Agassi J.. Corroboration versus induction. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 9 , pp. 311–317.Alexander H. G.. The paradoxes of confirmation—a reply to Dr. Agassi. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 10 , pp. 229–234.Watkins J. W. N.. Confirmation without background knowledge. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 10 , pp. 318–320. [REVIEW]David Kaplan - 1967 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (2):249-250.
Bar-Hillel Yehoshua. The present state of research on mechanical translation. American documentation , vol. 2 , pp. 229–237.Bar-Hillel Yehoshua. Some linguistic problems connected with machine translation. Philosophy of science, vol. 20 , pp. 217–225.Bar-Hillel Yehoshua. A quasi-arithmetical notation for syntactic description. Language, vol. 29 , pp. 47–58.Bar-Hillel Yehoshua. Can translation be mechanized? American scientist, vol. 42 , pp. 248–260. [REVIEW]Abraham Kaplan - 1955 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (2):192-194.
Adequacy and consistency: A second reply to dr bar-Hillel.K. R. Popper - 1956 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (27):249-256.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
33 (#693,203)

6 months
6 (#891,985)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references