- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Is there Progress in Philosophy? A Brief Case for Optimism
In Russell Blackford & Damien Broderick, Philosophy's Future. Hoboken: Wiley. pp. 105–117 (2017)
Abstract
This chapter sets out an optimistic view of philosophical progress. The key idea is that the historical record speaks in favor of there being progress at least if we are clear about what philosophical problems are, and what it takes to solve them. I end by asking why so many people tend toward a pessimistic view of philosophical progress.Author's Profile
Daniel Stoljar
Australian National University
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Is there Progress in Philosophy? A Brief Case for Optimism.Daniel Stoljar - 2017 - In Russell Blackford & Damien Broderick, Philosophy's Future: The Problem of Philosophical Progress. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Philosophical Progress: In Defence of a Reasonable Optimism.Daniel Stoljar - 2017 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Philosophical Progress: In Defence of a Reasonable Optimism, by Daniel Stoljar.Avner Baz - 2019 - Mind 128 (512):1371-1380.
Daniel Stoljar: Philosophical Progress. In Defence of a Reasonable Optimism: Oxford University Press, 2017, 192 pp., $40.Tobias Gutmann - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (5):1245-1246.
Does Philosophical Progress Matter?Richard Kamber - 2017 - In Russell Blackford & Damien Broderick, Philosophy's Future. Hoboken: Wiley. pp. 133–143.
Progress in Understanding Consciousness? Easy and Hard Problems, and Philosophical and Empirical Perspectives.Tobias A. Wagner-Altendorf - 2024 - Acta Analytica 2024 (4):1-18.
Progress in Understanding Consciousness? Easy and Hard Problems, and Philosophical and Empirical Perspectives.Tobias A. Wagner-Altendorf - 2024 - Acta Analytica 39 (4):719-736.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-15
Downloads
43 (#568,749)
6 months
14 (#222,453)
2023-06-15
Downloads
43 (#568,749)
6 months
14 (#222,453)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Daniel Stoljar
Australian National University
Citations of this work
Philosophical Progress, Skepticism, and Disagreement.Annalisa Coliva & Louis Doulas - 2024 - In Maria Baghramian, J. Adam Carter & Rach Cosker-Rowland, Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Disagreement. New York, NY: Routledge.
Challenging the Pursuit of Novelty.Emmalon Davis - 2023 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 101 (4):773-792.
References found in this work
The philosophical writings of Descartes.René Descartes - 1984 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Metaphysical grounding: understanding the structure of reality.Fabrice Correia & Benjamin Schnieder (eds.) - 2012 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The Case Against Representationalism About Moods.Amy Kind - 2013 - In Uriah Kriegel, Current Controversies in Philosophy of Mind. New York, New York: Routledge.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-9qhf6 uwo