- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Habermas, Marcuse and the aufhebung of science and technology
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 8 (1):15-35 (1978)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Book reviews : Antipositivist theories of the sciences. By Norman Stockman. Dordrecht: D. reidel, 1984. Pp. 284. $49.95. [REVIEW]Ben Agger - 1987 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 17 (1):121-123.
Book Reviews : Science and the Revenge of Nature: Marcuse and Habermas. By C. Fred Alford. Gainesville: University Presses of Florida, 1985. Pp. 226. $24.50 (hardcover. [REVIEW]Lorenzo C. Simpson - 1988 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 18 (4):572-577.
Marcuse, Habermas, and the critique of technology.Samir Gandesha - 2004 - In John Abromeit & William Mark Cobb (eds.), Herbert Marcuse: a critical reader. New York: Routledge.
Science and the Revenge of Nature: Marcuse and Habermas.C. Fred Alford - 1985 - University Press of Florida.
Marcuse and the "new science".Steven Vogel - 2004 - In John Abromeit & William Mark Cobb (eds.), Herbert Marcuse: a critical reader. New York: Routledge. pp. 240--6.
Kritik der "Politischen Technologie; iene Auseinandersetzung mit Herbert Marcuse und Jürgen Habermas.Hans-Dieter Bahr - 1970 - Europäische Verlagsanst.
Feenberg on Marcuse.Robert C. Scharff - 2006 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 9 (3):62-80.
Comments on Andrew Feenberg’s Heidegger and Marcuse.Daniel Dahlstrom - 2006 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 9 (3):52-61.
Explaining technology and society the problem of nature in Habermas.Stephen D. Parsons - 1992 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 22 (2):218-230.
C. Fred Alford, Science and the Revenge of Nature: Marcuse and Habermas Reviewed by.David Ingram - 1986 - Philosophy in Review 6 (7):324-326.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
37 (#611,759)
6 months
6 (#866,322)
2009-01-28
Downloads
37 (#611,759)
6 months
6 (#866,322)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Did Habermas Cede Nature to the Positivists?Gordon R. Mitchell - 2003 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 36 (1):1-21.
Marxism and the Two Sciences.John O'Neill - 1981 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11 (3):281-302.
Bibliography: Jürgen Habermas: An international bibliography.James W. Goulding, Susan L. Kline & Cary J. Nederman - 1980 - Political Theory 8 (2):259-285.
The Relationship Between Epistemological and Sociological Cognitive Interests: Some Ambiguities Underlying the Use of Interest Theory in the Study of Scientific Knowledge.Steven Yearley - 1982 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 13 (4):353.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-ls7fw uwo