- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Defending the Malleability of Perception: Reply to Commentators: Dokic, Orlandi, and Vetter
Journal of Consciousness Studies 30 (3):222-237 (2023)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Don't Take it Too Subpersonally! Revisiting the Malleability of Perception: Commentary on Dustin Stokes' Thinking and Perceiving.Jérôme Dokic - 2023 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 30 (3):192-201.
Functional Visual Perception Requires Cognitive Representations: Commentary on Dustin Stokes' Thinking and Perceiving.Petra Vetter - 2023 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 30 (3):212-221.
Perceptual Consciousness, Short-Term Memory, and Overflow: Replies to Beck, Orlandi and Franklin, and Phillips.Steven Gross & Jonathan Flombaum - 2017 - The Brains Blog.
Book Symposium: Thinking and Perceiving.Regina Fabry & Sascha Benjamin Fink - 2023 - Philosophy and the Mind Sciences 4.
Owning the Past Reply to Stokes.Galen Strawson - 2011 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 18 (3-4):3-4.
How radical is perceptual malleability? A reply to commentators.Dustin R. Stokes - 2023 - Philosophy and the Mind Sciences 4.
The Modularity vs. Malleability of Perception: A Red Herring.Nico Orlandi - 2023 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 30 (3):202-211.
Reply to Commentators.Elizabeth Schechter - 2022 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 29 (1-2):179-203.
Issues of Expertise in Perception and Imagination: Commentary on Stokes.Amy Kind - 2024 - Philosophical Studies 181 (8):1749-1756.
Panpsychism? Reply to commentators with a celebration of Descartes.Galen Strawson - 2006 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (10-11):184-280.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-04-06
Downloads
272 (#99,123)
6 months
80 (#77,616)
2023-04-06
Downloads
272 (#99,123)
6 months
80 (#77,616)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-ppxv8 uwo