Counterpart theory and four-dimensionalism: a reply to Eagle

Analysis 67 (3):263-267 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-8284.2007.00685.x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,290

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to Stone on Counterpart Theory and Four-Dimensionalism.Antony Eagle - 2007 - Analysis 67 (2):159 - 162.
Three-dimensionalism and counterpart theory.Simon Langford - 2005 - Analysis 65 (4):321-325.
Counterpart theory and three-dimensionalism: a reply.Jim Stone - 2005 - Analysis 65 (4):325-329.
Why counterpart theory and four-dimensionalism are incompatible.Jim Stone - 2005 - Analysis 65 (4):329-333.
Why counterpart theory and three-dimensionalism are incompatible.Jim Stone - 2005 - Analysis 65 (1):24-27.
From Spacetime to Space and Time: A Reply to Markosian.Baptiste Le Bihan - 2020 - Analysis 80 (3):456-462.
Modal realism, counterpart theory, and the possibility of multiversal rectitude.E. Conee - 2011 - Analysis 71 (4):680-684.
Non-branching and circularity - reply to Brueckner.Harold W. Noonan - 2006 - Analysis 66 (2):163-167.
Persistence, Ontic Vagueness and Identity: Towards a Substantialist Four–dimensionalism. [REVIEW]Enrique Romerales - 2008 - Metaphysica 9 (1):33-55.
Four Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time.Theodore Sider - 2001 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
132 (#165,522)

6 months
13 (#242,190)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jim Stone
University of New Orleans

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references