What every speaker knows

Philosophical Review 80 (4):476-496 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The question I hope to answer is brief: What does every speaker of a natural language know? My answer is briefer still: Nothing, or at least nothing interesting. Explaining the question, and making the answer plausible, is a longer job.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,060

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What every grammarian knows?Catherine Atherton - 1996 - Classical Quarterly 46 (01):239-.
Knowing the Answer.Jonathan Schaffer - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):383-403.
Gricean Semantics and Vague Speaker-Meaning.Stephen Schiffer - 2017 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):293-317.
Why there is Something rather than Nothing. [REVIEW]J. F. Bannan - 2006 - Review of Metaphysics 59 (3):679-680.
Is Prudence Love?Charles J. O’Neil - 1974 - The Monist 58 (1):119-139.
Something Rather Than Nothing.Guido Imaguire - 2022 - Philosophy 97 (1):1-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
86 (#243,112)

6 months
11 (#337,502)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Stich
Rutgers - New Brunswick

Citations of this work

Rules and representations.Noam A. Chomsky - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (127):1-61.
Rules and representations.Noam A. Chomsky - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1):1-15.
Beliefs and subdoxastic states.Stephen Stich - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (December):499-518.
The Philosophy of Generative Linguistics.Peter Ludlow - 2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Rules and causation.John R. Searle - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1):37-38.

View all 54 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references