Well-Structured Biology: Numerical Taxonomy's Epistemic Vision for Systematics

In Andrew Hamilton (ed.), Patterns in Nature. University of California Press. pp. 213-244 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What does it look like when a group of scientists set out to re-envision an entire field of biology in symbolic and formal terms? I analyze the founding and articulation of Numerical Taxonomy between 1950 and 1970, the period when it set out a radical new approach to classification and founded a tradition of mathematics in systematic biology. I argue that introducing mathematics in a comprehensive way also requires re-organizing the daily work of scientists in the field. Numerical taxonomists sought to establish a mathematical method for classification that was universal to every type of organism, and I argue this intrinsically implicated them in a qualitative re-organization of the work of all systematists. I also discuss how Numerical Taxonomy’s re-organization of practice became entrenched across systematic biology even as opposing schools produced their own competing mathematical methods. In this way, the structure of the work process became more fundamental than the methodological theories that motivated it.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The normative structure of mathematization in systematic biology.Beckett Sterner & Scott Lidgard - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 46 (1):44-54.
Re-writing Popper's Philosophy of Science for Systematics.Olivier Rieppel - 2008 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 30 (3-4):293 - 316.
Diagnosing Discordance: Signal in Data, Conflict in Paradigms.Aleta Quinn - 2019 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 11.
How Phenograms and Cladograms Became Molecular Phylogenetic Trees.Nina Kranke - 2024 - Journal of the History of Biology 57 (3):423-443.
The Principles of Biological Classification: The Use and Abuse of Philosophy.David L. Hull - 1978 - PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978 (2):130-153.
Dreaming of a Universal Biology: Synthetic Biology and the Origins of Life.Massimiliano Simons - 2021 - Hyle: International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 27:91-116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-16

Downloads
1,227 (#14,982)

6 months
130 (#39,738)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Beckett Sterner
Arizona State University

Citations of this work

Moving Past the Systematics Wars.Beckett Sterner & Scott Lidgard - 2018 - Journal of the History of Biology 51 (1):31-67.
“I would sooner die than give up”: Huxley and Darwin's deep disagreement.Mary P. Winsor - 2021 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 43 (2):1-36.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics.Peter Galison (ed.) - 1997 - University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

View all 14 references / Add more references