How should we interpret dead philosophers?

Forum for European Philosophy Blog (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Tom Stern on the problem with the principle of charity as a way to interpret figures in the history of philosophy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Principle of Charity, Transcendentalism and Relativism.María Rosario Hernández Borges - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:69-75.
Nietzsche and the Principle of Charity.Jeffrey Metzger - 2022 - The European Legacy 27 (5):474-489.
Relative Charity.Fabien Schang - 2009 - Revista Brasileira de Filosofia 233:159-172.
Interpretation Under Oppression: Charity is Not Enough.A. K. Flowerree - forthcoming - Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics.
“Some Third Thing”: Nietzsche's Words and the Principle of Charity.Tom Stern - 2016 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 47 (2):287-302.
Ontology in Plain English.John Horden - 2014 - Philosophical Quarterly 64 (255):225-242.
Charity Implies Meta‐Charity.Roy Sorensen - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2):290-315.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-31

Downloads
35 (#689,326)

6 months
4 (#909,732)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tom Stern
University College London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references