Factual Constraints on Interpreting

The Monist 73 (2):205-221 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A fundamental change in the understanding of interpreting has taken place since the beginning of this century. Many interpreters no longer believe that in interpreting we discover the meaning of what was said or done. Meaning is understood as a product of interpreting, not its object: interpretations are constructions. This change does not free interpreters from the constraints of objectivity and it does not contribute to the lowering of standards for evaluating interpretations.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Interpretive Reasoning.Laurent Stern - 2005 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Over interpreting Wittgenstein.Anat Biletzki - 2003 - Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Interpreting Minds by.Radu J. Bogdan & Vg Hardcastle - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):737-740.
Art and its Canons.David Carrier - 1993 - The Monist 76 (4):524-534.
The Psychoanalytic Mind: From Freud to Philosophy. [REVIEW]Christine Watling - 1996 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 17 (3):287-290.
Objectivity and Change in Moral Values.G. H. Langley - 1934 - The Monist 44 (2):262-279.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
61 (#354,025)

6 months
11 (#377,362)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references