Freedom and Constraints

Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):186-186 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Social Autopoiesis?” by Hugo Urrestarazu. Upshot: Urrestarazu, basing himself on Maturana and Varela, argues that human society is not autopoietic. This commentary presents a counter-argument, the main point being that freedom is not to be confused with an absence of constraints

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Freedom and Constraints in Prometheus Bound.Kenneth Dorter - 1992 - Interpretation 19 (2):117-135.
Communication, Autopoiesis and Semiosis.H. F. Alrøe & E. Noe - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):183-185.
Human Autopoiesis?A. Kravchenko - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):177-179.
The Autopoiesis of Social Systems.R. Vanderstraeten - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):181-183.
How Can a Social System Be Autopoietic?Raivo Palmaru - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):170-172.
Autopoiesis and Autonomy in the Space of Meaning.A. Karafillidis - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):175-177.
Understanding Social Systems?H. R. Maturana - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):187-188.
Against a Reductive Materialism of the Social.P. Berger - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):172-174.
Social Systems: Unearthing the Big Picture.S. J. Cowley & V. Raimondi - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):179-181.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-15

Downloads
6 (#1,728,771)

6 months
6 (#622,431)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references