Evaluative and supervenient words: A reply [Book Review]

Journal of Value Inquiry 3 (1):46-48 (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00137670

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Mr. Stearns on naturalism.James W. Nickel - 1969 - Journal of Value Inquiry 3 (1):43-45.
Reply to J. Narveson's Review of Reason and Value.E. J. Bond - 1984 - Dialogue 23 (2):337-339.
Factual and evaluative statements.GeorgeW Roberts - 1967 - Journal of Value Inquiry 1 (2):149-150.
The meaning of evaluative expressions.Bernard Davis - 1971 - Journal of Value Inquiry 5 (3):219-225.
The analytic-synthetic and the descriptive-evaluative distinctions.Bruce Kuklick - 1969 - Journal of Value Inquiry 3 (2):91-99.
Supervenient properties and micro-based concepts: A reply to Noordhof.Jaegwon Kim - 1999 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (1):115-118.
Value words and value judgments.Haig Khatchadourian - 1968 - Journal of Value Inquiry 2 (2-3):166-186.
No “fact-value gap” for Hume?: A reply to Konrad. [REVIEW]T. L. Beauchamp - 1973 - Journal of Value Inquiry 7 (1):52-59.
Value as a gestalt quality: Reply to professor James. [REVIEW]Risieri Frondizi - 1979 - Journal of Value Inquiry 13 (3):225-230.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
23 (#946,185)

6 months
5 (#1,056,575)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A refutation of axiological naturalism.J. Brenton Stearns - 1967 - Journal of Value Inquiry 1 (2):117-123.

Add more references