A Hegelian Logic of ‘Us’: Implicit Forms and Explicit Representations of Actions and Practices

Hegel Bulletin 40 (3):374-397 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In order to understand Hegel's gnomic oracle according to which the ‘I’ is a ‘We’, the notion of apersonalsubject is explained by its competence to perform personal roles in a pre-given partition of roles. Explicit divisions of labour by contractual promises are special cases that presuppose the general case of an already established social practice. On the other hand, methodological individualism is right to stress that we actualize joint intentions only via corresponding instantiations. In performing our parts, we form a plural subject, a we-group. The result of what each of us does is what we do, and the generic ‘We’ turns into the generic ‘I’.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,885

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-10

Downloads
43 (#566,335)

6 months
6 (#702,492)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pirmin Stekeler-Weithofer
Universität Leipzig

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Meaning.Herbert Paul Grice - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (3):377-388.
Convention: A Philosophical Study.David Lewis - 1969 - Synthese 26 (1):153-157.
On Social Facts.Margaret Gilbert - 1989 - Ethics 102 (4):853-856.

View all 6 references / Add more references