Utterance meaning and syntactic ellipsis

Pragmatics and Cognition 5 (1):51-78 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Speakers often use ordinary words and phrases, unembedded in any sentence, to perform speech acts—or so it appears. In some cases appearances are deceptive: The seemingly lexical/phrasal utterance may really be an utterance of a syntactically eplliptical sentence. I argue however that, at least sometimes, plain old words and phrases are used on their own. The use of both words/phrases and elliptical sentences leads to two consequences: 1. Context must contribute more to utterance meaning than is often supposed. Here's why: The semantic type of normal words and phrases is non-proppositional, even after the usual contextual features are added . Yet an utterance of a word/phrase can be fully propositional. 2. Often, a hearer does not need to know the exact identity of the expression uttered, to understand an utterance. The reason: Typically, words/phrases in context will sound the same, and mean the same, as some elliptical sentence token

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Non-Sentential Assertions.Robert James Harold Stainton - 1993 - Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
What Do Words Do for Us?Ronnie Cann & Ruth Kempson - 2017 - Dialectica 71 (3):425-460.
Using non-sentences: An application of Relevance Theory.Robert Stainton - 1994 - Pragmatics and Cognition 2 (2):269-284.
On local bars and imported beer.Richard Vallée - 2012 - Pragmatics and Cognition 20 (1):62-87.
Force and Meaning.Marilyn Frye - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (10):281-294.
Ambiguity.Kent Bach - manuscript
Truth and what is said.Elia Zardini - 2008 - Philosophical Perspectives 22 (1):545-574.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-08

Downloads
102 (#208,017)

6 months
15 (#209,898)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Stainton
Western University

Citations of this work

Context and logical form.Jason Stanley - 2000 - Linguistics and Philosophy 23 (4):391--434.
Relevance theory.Deirdre Wilson & Dan Sperber - 2002 - In Deirdre Wilson & Dan Sperber (eds.), Relevance theory. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 607-632.
Fragments and ellipsis.Jason Merchant - 2004 - Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (6):661 - 738.
Scare quotes and their relation to other semantic issues.Stefano Predelli - 2003 - Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (1):1-28.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references