Unlikely Candidates for Paradigmatic Cases of Intercultural Communication, reply to Van Brakel

Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 3:295-305 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Crosscultural Communication in Language and Law, reply to Van Brakel.M. Loth - 2006 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 3:285-294.
Reply to van Brakel.D. K. Buckner - 1985 - Analysis 45 (4):215-217.
Past de Staat der Nederlanden in het verdachtenbankje?N. Rozemond - 2002 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 2:3-8.
Monotheïsme kan uw staat ernstige schade toebrengen.Wouter Been - 2011 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 40 (2):139-145.
Fundamentals of Comparative and Intercultural Philosophy by Lin Ma, Jaap van Brakel.Mary L. Keller - 2018 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 39 (2):74-77.
Van Brakel and the not-so-naked emperor.Clyde L. Hardin - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (1):137-50.
An Agonist's Reply.B. Honig - 2008 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 37 (2):186-199.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references