On the role of analytic thinking in religious belief change: Evidence from over 50,000 participants in 16 countries

&
Cognition 254 (C):105989 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105989

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Should critical thinking courses include the critique of religious beliefs?Donald Hatcher & Mark Battersby - unknown
Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories.Viren Swami, Martin Voracek, Stefan Stieger, Ulrich S. Tran & Adrian Furnham - 2014 - Cognition 133 (3):572-585.
Atheists and Agnostics Are More Reflective than Religious Believers: Four Empirical Studies and a Meta-Analysis.Gordon Pennycook, Robert M. Ross, Derek J. Koehler & Jonathan A. Fugelsang - 2016 - PLoS ONE 11 (4):e0153039.
Bayesian or biased? Analytic thinking and political belief updating.Ben M. Tappin, Gordon Pennycook & David G. Rand - 2020 - Cognition 204 (C):104375.
The Role of Evidence in Reformed Epistemology.Michael Douglas Krogman - 1998 - Dissertation, The University of Tennessee
Individual differences in epistemically suspect beliefs: the role of analytic thinking and susceptibility to cognitive biases.Jakub Šrol - 2022 - Thinking and Reasoning 28 (1):125-162.
Cognitive style and religiosity: The role of conflict detection.Gordon Pennycook, James Allan Cheyne, Nathaniel Barr, Derek J. Koehler & Jonathan A. Fugelsang - 2014 - Memory and Cognition 42 (1):1-10.
Metarepresentations of Supernatural Belief and the Effect of Context on Cognition.Malcolm Schofield, David Sheffield & Ian Baker - 2022 - Journal of Scientific Exploration 36 (2).
Disfluency attenuates the reception of pseudoprofound and postmodernist bullshit.Ryan E. Tracy, Nicolas Porot, Eric Mandelbaum & Steven G. Young - 2023 - Thinking and Reasoning 1 (4):579-611.
Dialectical Versus Linear Thinking Shapes People’s Anticipation of Climate Change.Liman Man Wai Li, Dongmei Mei, Wen-Qiao Li & Kenichi Ito - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-11-02

Downloads
6 (#1,692,869)

6 months
6 (#851,135)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Stagnaro
Yale University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition Advancing the Debate.Jonathan Evans & Keith E. Stanovich - 2013 - Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (3):223-241.

View all 21 references / Add more references