Evidence and explanation in Kant's doctrine of laws

Studi Kantiani 34:141-49 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I emphasize two merits of Eric Watkins’ account in "Kant on Laws": the strong evidential support it has, and the central place it gives to Kant’s laws of mechanics. Then, I raise two questions for further research. 1. What kind of evidential reasoning confirms a Kantian law? 2. Do natures explain Kantian laws? If so, how?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant's Necessitation Account of Laws and the Nature of Natures.James Messina - 2017 - In Michela Massimi & Angela Breitenbach (eds.), Kant and the Laws of Nature. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Watkins on Kant’s Laws of Nature.Janum Sethi - 2021 - Kantian Review 26 (2):307-314.
Kant on Laws by Eric Watkins.Paul Guyer - 2020 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 58 (3):617-618.
Kant's Response to Hume in the Second Analogy.Saniye Vatansever - 2015 - Dissertation, University of Illinois, Chicago
Two Concepts of Law of Nature.Brendan Shea - 2013 - Prolegomena 12 (2):413-442.
Laws of Nature and Free Will.Pedro Merlussi - 2017 - Dissertation, Durham University
Metaphysical Foundations of Neoclassical Mechanics.Marius Stan - 2017 - In Michela Massimi & Angela Breitenbach (eds.), Kant and the Laws of Nature. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 214-234.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-31

Downloads
369 (#76,770)

6 months
65 (#90,483)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marius Stan
Boston College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references