- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Behind Closed Doors: Irbs and the Making of Ethical Research
University of Chicago Press (2011)
Abstract
IRBs in action -- Everyone's an expert? Warrants for expertise -- Local precedents -- Documents and deliberations: an anticipatory perspective -- Setting IRBs in motion in Cold War America -- An ethics of place -- The many forms of consent -- Deflecting responsibility -- Conclusion: the making of ethical research.Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Behind Closed Doors: IRBs and the Making of Ethical Research. [REVIEW]Susan Reverby - 2011 - Isis 103:810-811.
Research ethics committees: A regional approach.Cheryl Cox Macpherson - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (2):161-179.
Regulating human research: IRBs from peer review to compliance bureaucracy.Sarah Babb - 2020 - Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Experimentation on Human Subjects.Patrick Boleyn-Fitzgerald - 2003 - In R. G. Frey & Christopher Heath Wellman (eds.), A Companion to Applied Ethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 410–423.
Evaluating the science and ethics of research on humans: a guide for IRB members.Dennis John Mazur - 2007 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
How idiocultures and warrants operate independently in New Zealand health ethics review boards.Martin Tolich - 2015 - Research Ethics 11 (2):67-81.
Barriers to Research on Research Ethics Review and Conflicts of Interest.Bryn Williams-Jones, Marie-Josée Potvin, Ghislaine Mathieu & Elise Smith - 2013 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 35 (5):14-20.
Ethical challenges in study design and informed consent for health research in resource-poor settings.Patricia Loomis Marshall - 2007 - Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Ethical and Legal Considerations for IRBs: Research with Medical Records.Dale H. Cowan & Bernard R. Adams - 1979 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 1 (8):1.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-04-21
Downloads
31 (#724,843)
6 months
4 (#1,246,434)
2011-04-21
Downloads
31 (#724,843)
6 months
4 (#1,246,434)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Experimental Design: Ethics, Integrity and the Scientific Method.Jonathan Lewis - 2020 - In Ron Iphofen (ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. pp. 459-474.
Making researchers moral: Why trustworthiness requires more than ethics guidelines and review.Linus Johnsson, Stefan Eriksson, Gert Helgesson & Mats G. Hansson - 2014 - Research Ethics 10 (1):29-46.
Ethical Issues in Text Mining for Mental Health.Joshua Skorburg & Phoebe Friesen - forthcoming - In Morteza Dehghani & Ryan Boyd (eds.), The Atlas of Language Analysis in Psychology. Guilford Press.
The Ethics Ecosystem: Personal Ethics, Network Governance and Regulating Actors Governing the Use of Social Media Research Data.Gabrielle Samuel, Gemma E. Derrick & Thed van Leeuwen - 2019 - Minerva 57 (3):317-343.
Oversight: Community vulnerabilities in the blind spot of research ethics.Nicholas G. Cragoe - 2017 - Research Ethics 15 (2):1-15.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-xdmqb uwo