A Disputed Compound in Aeschylus (χαλκοκραυνος)

Classical Quarterly 34 (3-4):131- (1940)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The epithet χαλκοκραυνον has perturbed many, though the most recent English editors have printed it without comment. The new Liddell and Scott betrays uneasiness in its ‘epithet of the sea, perhaps false reading for χαλκαμρυγος, gleaming like copper or bronze’. Overseas scholars flatly reject it. Wilamowitz poured scorn on it in his Interpretationen and commented in his larger edition neque intelligitur et frustra temptatum est. Weir Smyth obelizes it. Bothe, Hermann, Weil, and others offered emendations. In Bursians Jahresberichte, ccxxxiv, p. 104 W. Morel observed Von Erz und Blitz befreit uns Bruhns χλιαρκρουνον. This is emancipation indeed

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Question of Mens in Lucretius 2.289.I. Avotins - 1979 - Classical Quarterly 29 (01):95-.
Noctes Statianae.Ken Dowden - 1979 - Classical Quarterly 29 (01):225-.
Collations of Platonis W.W. L. Lorimer - 1950 - Classical Quarterly 44 (3-4):106-.
Notes on Livy, Books 1–5.W. S. Watt - 1989 - Classical Quarterly 39 (02):415-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-09

Downloads
27 (#827,827)

6 months
12 (#301,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references