Autonomy, authenticity, or best interest: Everyday decision-making and persons with dementia [Book Review]

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):153-159 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The question of when we have justification for overriding ordinary, everyday decisions of persons with dementia is considered. It is argued that no single criterion for competent decision-making is able to distinguish reliably between decisions we can legitimately override and decisions we cannot legitimately override

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dementia, Healthcare Decision Making, and Disability Law.Megan S. Wright - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (S4):25-33.
Advance decisions and proxy decision-making in the elderly : a medical perspective.Gary Sinoff & Natalia Blaja-Lisnic - 2014 - In Charles Foster, Jonathan Herring & Israel Doron (eds.), The law and ethics of dementia. Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.
“As Long As I’m Me”: From Personhood to Personal Identity in Dementia and Decisionmaking.James Toomey - 2021 - Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique 4 (1):57-69.
Ourselves, with Dementia.Rebecca Dresser - 2022 - Hastings Center Report 52 (4):3-3.
Challenges of anticipation of future decisions in dementia and dementia research.Julia Perry - 2022 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 44 (4):1-29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
121 (#179,724)

6 months
9 (#500,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Life's Dominion.Melissa Lane & Ronald Dworkin - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (176):413.

Add more references