Metaphoric Analysis of the Debate on Physician Assisted Suicide

(1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This volume uses metaphoric analysis to explore the rhetorical aspects of the debate as represented in the published works of three physicians with opposing views: Dr C. Everett Koop; Dr Jack Kevorkian, and Dr Timothy Quill. After examining the texts, the author invents a hybrid metaphorical concept which can serve as a rhetorical bridge for participants in the debate. Once this metaphorical means of communication is in place, the necessary exloration of ethical systems can occur.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,492

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Was dr. Kevorkian right?Taylor Keith - 2003 - Free Inquiry 23 (2).
Ještě o etice eutanazie: odpovědi kritikům.Tomas Hribek - 2011 - Filosoficky Casopis 59 (6):911-931.
On the Subject(s) of Jack Kevorkian, M.D.: A Retrospective Analysis.Tom Koch - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):436-441.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
6 (#1,748,683)

6 months
1 (#1,603,167)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references