Ashley's Interests Were Not Violated Because She Does Not Have the Necessary Interests

American Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):52-54 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

(2010). Ashley's Interests Were Not Violated Because She Does Not Have the Necessary Interests. The American Journal of Bioethics: Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 52-54

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265160903460863

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The interests of egg donors: Who is deceiving whom?Cynthia B. Cohen - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (4):20 – 21.
Medical confidentiality and protection of third party interests.Elaine Gibson - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (2):23 – 25.
Neonatal Decision-Making: Beyond the Standard of Best Interests.Robert D. Truog & Sadath A. Sayeed - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (2):44 - 45.
Against the use of medical technologies for military or national security interests.Leah Rosenberg & Eric Gehrie - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):22 – 24.
For-Profit Clinical Trials in Developing Countries—Those Troublesome Patient Benefits.Udo Schuklenk - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):52-54.
Ambiguous Interests: Maternal Desires and Fetal Interests.Peter Maloy Koch - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):31-33.
Can Families Have Interests?Rosalind McDougall - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (11):27-29.
Not All Conflicts Are Bad: Why Some Conflicts of Interests Advance Patients’ Interests.Daniel J. Benedetti & Alexander Langerman - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (10):92-94.
The Pitfalls of Misreading: What Does “Industry Funding of Medical Education” Actually Say?Bethany Spielman - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):24-25.
Ashley Revisited: A Response to the Peer Commentaries.Douglas Diekema & Norman Fost - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):4-6.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
63 (#338,626)

6 months
10 (#418,198)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Ashley Revisited: A Response to the Peer Commentaries.Douglas Diekema & Norman Fost - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):4-6.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ashley Revisited: A Response to the Critics.Douglas S. Diekema & Norman Fost - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):30-44.
Growth Attenuation: Good Intentions, Bad Decision.Adrienne Asch & Anna Stubblefield - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):46-48.
Ethics or Advocacy?Dick Sobsey - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):59-60.

Add more references