- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Justifying a respect for nature
Environmental Ethics 4 (3):255-260 (1982)
Abstract
Paul W. Taylor has proposed a foundational structure for developing a respect for nature. This structure appears to go weIl beyond what is needed to justify such respect. The intricacies and nuances of life on Earth can gain our respect without attempting the impossible task of abandoning our human perspective or a particular interest in our own speciesOther Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Analogical Extension and Analogical Implication in Environmental Moral Philosophy.Jeremy Bendik-Keymer - 2001 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (2):149-158.
Species Egalitarianism and Respect for Nature.Lucia Schwarz - 2021 - In Richard Dean & Oliver Sensen (eds.), Respect: philosophical essays. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 208-302.
Environmental Ethics and the Built Environment.Roger J. H. King - 2000 - Environmental Ethics 22 (2):115-131.
Age of Man Environmentalism and Respect for an Independent Nature.Ned Hettinger - 2021 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 24 (1):75-87.
Political respect for nature.Sharon R. Krause - 2021 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 47 (2):241-266.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
109 (#195,789)
6 months
8 (#587,211)
2009-01-28
Downloads
109 (#195,789)
6 months
8 (#587,211)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Being Consistently Biocentric: On the (Im)possibility of Spinozist Animal Ethics.Chandler D. Rogers - 2021 - Journal for Critical Animal Studies 18 (1):52-72.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-fcc9b7db9-2cdf9 uwo