"Philosophy of Logic" and the Work of Quine

Russian Studies in Philosophy 13 (1):86-99 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is possible that some logician may not know that a and b exist, not know what they denote, and whether they are true or untrue. But virtually every logician will agree that the expression a ⊃ b cannot be true in a case in which a is true and b is false. Truth relationships thus understood — inasmuch as they are not specific to any particular field of science — are generally regarded as the proper concern of logic. Only their study can uncover the typically human capacity to derive one piece of knowledge from another without referring back directly to objective reality

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Knowledge without Truth.Priyedarshi Jetli - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:97-103.
Truth-Making and Divine Eternity.Kevin Timpe - 2007 - Religious Studies 43 (3):299 - 315.
Formal Logic and Dialectics.Chou Ku-Ch'eng - 1969 - Chinese Studies in Philosophy 1 (1):5.
Testability and meaning (part 1).Rudolf Carnap - 1936 - Philosophy of Science 3 (4):420-71.
Testability and meaning.Rudolf Carnap - 1936 - Philosophy of Science 3 (4):419-471.
Descriptions in nonextensional contexts.Gustav Bergmann - 1948 - Philosophy of Science 15 (4):353-355.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-27

Downloads
26 (#861,660)

6 months
6 (#891,985)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references