A note on the "supposition dragon"

Abstract

In the summer of 1980, I was privileged to be on the teaching staff of the Summer Institute on Medieval Philosophy held at Cornell University under the direction of Norman Kretzmann and the auspices of the Council for Philosophical Studies and the National Endowment for the Humanities. While I was giving a series of lectures on supposition theory, I went to my office one morning, and there under the door some anonymous wag from the Institute had slid the pen and ink drawing you see in the graphic. It represents "Supposition" as a dragon, making a rude face at the viewer. The tail of the dragon is divided — not entirely accurately, as it turns out — into the various branches and subbranches of supposition. If the details are not altogether correct, the spirit is certainly understandable. I have absolutely no idea who the inspired artist was, but I have the original framed on the wall in my office.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,601

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
38 (#637,245)

6 months
3 (#1,118,764)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Vincent Spade
Indiana University, Bloomington

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On sense and reference.Gottlob Frege - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel, Arguing about language. New York: Routledge. pp. 36--56.
[no title].Eleonore Stump (ed.) - 1993 - Cornell Univ Pr.
Anselm and actuality.David K. Lewis - 1970 - Noûs 4 (2):175-188.

View all 66 references / Add more references