Policing with big data: Matching vs Crime Prediction

In Kevin Macnish & Jai Galliott (eds.), Big Data and Democracy. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 57-70 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter I defend the construction of inclusive, tightly governed DNA databases, as long as police can access them only for the prosecution of the most serious crimes or less serious but very high-volume offences. I deny that that the ethics of collecting and using these data sets the pattern for other kinds of policing by big data, notably predictive policing. DNA databases are primarily used for matching newly gathered biometric data with stored data. After considering and disputing a number of objections to this practice, I conclude that DNA databases used in this way are ethically acceptable, if not valuable, contributions to legitimate policing.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-15

Downloads
249 (#105,862)

6 months
68 (#88,050)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tom Sorell
University of Warwick

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Concealment and Exposure.Thomas Nagel - 1998 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (1):3-30.
Bulk Collection, Intrusion and Domination.Tom Sorell - 2018 - In Andrew I. Cohen (ed.), Philosophy and Public Policy. New York, USA: Rowman & Littlefield International. pp. 39-61.
The Scope of Serious Crime and Preventive Justice.Tom Sorell - 2016 - Criminal Justice Ethics 35 (3):163-182.

View all 6 references / Add more references