Newcomb's problem: Recalculations for the one-boxer

Theory and Decision 15 (4):399-404 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00162115

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Equal Opportunity and Newcomb’s Problem.Ian Wells - 2019 - Mind 128 (510):429-457.
The One-boxing Intuition in Newcomb's Problem.Camilla Grundy - unknown
Reversing 30 years of discussion: why causal decision theorists should one-box.Wolfgang Spohn - 2012 - Synthese 187 (1):95-122.
Review of Arif Ahmed (ed.), Newcomb's Problem. [REVIEW]Jack Spencer - 2019 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2019.
Newcomb’s Problem, Arif Ahmed (editor). Cambridge University Press, 2018, 233 pages. [REVIEW]J. Dmitri Gallow - 2020 - Economics and Philosophy 36 (1):171-176.
Newcomb, frustrated.Rhys Borchert & Jack Spencer - 2023 - Analysis 84 (3):449-456.
Newcomb's Problem.Arif Ahmed (ed.) - 2018 - Cambridge University Press.
The value of information in Newcomb's Problem and the Prisoners' Dilemma.Paul Snow - 1985 - Theory and Decision 18 (2):129-133.
Newcomb's Hidden Regress.Stephen Maitzen & Garnett Wilson - 2003 - Theory and Decision 54 (2):151-162.
Why You Should One-box in Newcomb's Problem.Howard J. Simmons - manuscript

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-04

Downloads
66 (#322,137)

6 months
11 (#358,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Roy Sorensen
University of Texas at Austin

Citations of this work

A robust resolution of Newcomb’s paradox.Thomas A. Weber - 2016 - Theory and Decision 81 (3):339-356.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references