Hypocrisy and Integrity [Book Review]

Dialogue 38 (3):671-673 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

“When is it good to be a little bad? And particularly, when and why is it necessary, when being a little bad, to maintain the appearance of goodness?”. These are among the provocative questions Ruth Grant raises in this book, which contributes to the growing body of literature on hypocrisy and integrity, particularly as they apply to politics. Grant focuses to a large degree on Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s conception of integrity and its relevance to contemporary politics, but she also tries to identify different types of hypocrisy and to argue that hypocrisy is both inevitable and desirable in the political realm. As a work on interpreting Rousseau, Grant’s book is thorough and interesting. As an attempt at understanding hypocrisy and integrity and their moral status, this book is not as rigorous as one might like, but it does contain a number of worthwhile insights and arguments.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,902

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-25

Downloads
50 (#433,838)

6 months
7 (#684,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eldon Soifer
University of Regina

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Hypocrisy and Moral Seriousness.Roger Crisp & Christopher J. Cowton - 1994 - American Philosophical Quarterly 31 (4):343 - 349.
On hypocrisy.Eva Feder Kittay - 1982 - Metaphilosophy 13 (3-4):277-289.
Hypocrisy, with a Note on Integrity.Christine McKinnon - 1991 - American Philosophical Quarterly 28 (4):321 - 330.

View all 8 references / Add more references