The design argument

In Neil A. Manson, God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge. pp. 25--53 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The design argument is one of three main arguments for the existence of God; the others are the ontological argument and the cosmological argument. Unlike the ontological argument, the design argument and the cosmological argument are a posteriori. And whereas the cosmological argument could focus on any present event to get the ball rolling (arguing that it must trace back to a first cause, namely God), design theorists are usually more selective.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,108

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The design argument.Elliott Sober - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson, God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge. pp. 25--53.
The Design Argument.Elliott Sober - 1900 - Cambridge University Press.
The design argument and natural theology.Neil A. Manson - 2013 - In J. H. Brooke, F. Watts & R. R. Manning, The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology. Oxford Up. pp. 295.
Anthropocentrism and the design argument.Neil A. Manson - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (2):163-176.
Firing squads and fine-tuning: Sober on the design argument.Jonathan Weisberg - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):809-821.
Likelihood, Analogy, and the Design Argument: A Discussion of Sober.Richard Foley - 2013 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 16 (1):309-330.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-27

Downloads
2 (#1,906,870)

6 months
2 (#1,302,720)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elliott Sober
University of Wisconsin, Madison

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references