Valid comparisons of suprathreshold sensations

Journal of Consciousness Studies 11 (7-8):7-8 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Individual experience is subjective: We can describe experiences, but we cannot share them directly. Thus, many investigators favour threshold measures of experience , while suprathreshold methods are met with scepticism. We believe that suprathreshold measures are useful, as they reveal group differences in sensation that cannot be observed with thresholds. These differences, however, are distorted when scales are used incorrectly. Of particular interest, oral sensory intensity predicts long-term health outcomes ; these findings are validated by robust differences in oral anatomy, suggesting that valid suprathreshold comparisons convey accurate and meaningful differences in experience

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sensory awareness.Russell Hurlburt & Christopher L. Heavey - 2009 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 16 (10-12):10-12.
Information processing by cortical subthreshold and suprathreshold activity.K. Kirschfeld - 1996 - In Enrique Villanueva (ed.), Perception. Ridgeview Pub. Co. pp. 2-2.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
30 (#751,717)

6 months
2 (#1,685,650)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references