Would Survival Have to Be Survival of an Astral Body? A Reply to Professor Flew

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (3):481 - 494 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One of the conclusions reached by Antony Flew in his interesting paper “Is There a Case for Disembodied Survival?” is that “if there is to be a case for individual and personal survival, what survives must be some sort of astral body.” In the present paper I shall investigate whether he is really justified, on the basis of the arguments he presents, in drawing this conclusion.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Smook.Antony Flew - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (3):495 - 497.
Professor Penelhum on the Resurrection of the Body.Robert Young - 1973 - Religious Studies 9 (2):181 - 187.
Introduction.Keith Augustine - 2015 - In Keith Augustine & Michael Martin (eds.), The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life After Death. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 1-47.
Merely mortal?: can you survive your own death?Antony Flew - 2000 - Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. Edited by Antony Flew.
Out-of-Body Experiences are not Evidence for Survival.Susan Blackmore - 2015 - In Keith Augustine & Michael Martin (eds.), The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life After Death. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 519-527.
Is causation necessary for what matters in survival?Scott Campbell - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (3):375-396.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
33 (#692,402)

6 months
4 (#1,269,568)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Egoicity and twins.Roger Smook - 1988 - Dialogue 27 (2):277-86.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references