Gene Drives and Genome Modification in Nonhuman Animals: A Concern for Informed Consent?

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (1):93-99 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In recent years, CRISPR-Cas9 has become one of the simplest and most cost-effective genetic engineering techniques among scientists and researchers aiming to alter genes in organisms. As Zika came to the fore as a global health crisis, many suggested the use of CRISPR-Cas9 gene drives in mosquitoes as a possible means to prevent the transmission of the virus without the need to subject humans to risky experimental treatments. This paper suggests that using gene drives or other forms of genome editing in nonhumans (like mosquitos) for the purposes of disease prevention raises important issues about informed consent. Additionally, it examines the consequences this line of inquiry could have for the use of gene drives as a tool in public health and suggests that the guidance offered by informed consent protocols could help the scientific community deploy gene drives in a way that ensures that ongoing research is consistent with our ethical priorities.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-21

Downloads
47 (#467,133)

6 months
9 (#475,977)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joanna Smolenski
Baylor College of Medicine

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references