What we mean, what we think we mean, and how language can surprise us

In E. Romero & B. Soria, Explicit Communication: Robyn Carston's Pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In uttering a sentence we are often take to assert more than its literal meaning - though sometimes we assert less. This phenomenon is taken by many to show that what is said or asserted by a speaker on an occasion is a contextually enriched or developed version of the semantic content of the words uttered. I argue that we can resist this conclusion by recognizing that what we think we are asserting, or take others to assert, involves selective attention to just one of the ways a sentence could be true and neglects others. In most conversations people converge in their selective attention and communication is not impaired. Though in the case of sentences involving predicates of personal taste, people's attention to aspects of what is claimed differs and this can lead to intractable disputes. I offer a diagnosis of such disputes where speakers can disagree about the same claim and both be right.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Context ex Machina.Kent Bach - 2004 - In Zoltan Gendler Szabo, Semantics Versus Pragmatics. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 15--44.
Metasemantic Relationism.Seth Yalcin - 2021 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 45:541-560.
Semantics and What is Said.Una Stojnic & Ernie Lepore - 2018 - In Alessandro Capone, Una Stojnic, Ernie Lepore, Denis Delfitto, Anne Reboul, Gaetano Fiorin, Kenneth A. Taylor, Jonathan Berg, Herbert L. Colston, Sanford C. Goldberg, Edoardo Lombardi Vallauri, Cliff Goddard, Anna Wierzbicka, Magdalena Sztencel, Sarah E. Duffy, Alessandra Falzone, Paola Pennisi, Péter Furkó, András Kertész, Ágnes Abuczki, Alessandra Giorgi, Sona Haroutyunian, Marina Folescu, Hiroko Itakura, John C. Wakefield, Hung Yuk Lee, Sumiyo Nishiguchi, Brian E. Butler, Douglas Robinson, Kobie van Krieken, José Sanders, Grazia Basile, Antonino Bucca, Edoardo Lombardi Vallauri & Kobie van Krieken, Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages. Springer Verlag. pp. 21-38.
Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and The Methodology of Philosophy.David Plunkett - 2015 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 58 (7-8):828-874.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
299 (#96,760)

6 months
48 (#105,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Barry C. Smith
School of Advanced Study, University of London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references