The problem of abortion and negative and positive duty

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 3 (3):245-252 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Supererogation and Duty.F. M. Kamm - 2023 - In David Heyd (ed.), Handbook of Supererogation. Springer Nature Singapore. pp. 29-49.
Between the horns of the negative-positive duty debate.H. M. Malm - 1991 - Philosophical Studies 61 (3):187 - 210.
Directions of Justification in the Negative-Positive Duty Debate.H. M. Malm - 1990 - American Philosophical Quarterly 27 (4):315 - 324.
Childbearing, Abortion and Regret: A Response to Kate Greasley.Anthony McCarthy - forthcoming - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics: Philosophy of Medical Research and Practice (forthcoming).
Vulnerability Ethics, Abortion, and Organ Donation.Elizabeth Latham - 2024 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 33 (2):300-306.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-14

Downloads
76 (#277,319)

6 months
10 (#422,339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

How philosophy of medicine has changed medical ethics.Robert Veatch - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (6):585 – 600.
On evoking clinical meaning.Richard Zaner - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (6):655 – 666.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references