Truth, Negation, and the Limit of Inquiry

Southwest Philosophy Review 25 (2):79-94 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

08972346

DOI

10.5840/swphilreview200925239

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Scepticism, Truth and Pragmatic Inquiry.Andrew Ward - 2000 - Southwest Philosophy Review 17 (1):159-172.
Classical and Intuitionistic Negation.Michael Hand - 1992 - Southwest Philosophy Review 8 (1):157-164.
Philosophy at the Limit.Patrick Bourgeois - 1997 - Southwest Philosophy Review 13 (2):153-170.
John & Susan & Bill & Smith.Dave Beisecker - 2016 - Southwest Philosophy Review 32 (2):35-38.
Taking the Two Envelope Paradox to the Limit.Don Fallis - 2009 - Southwest Philosophy Review 25 (2):95-111.
Comment on “Solving the Puzzle of Aesthetic Assertion” by Andrew Morgan.E. M. Dadlez - 2017 - Southwest Philosophy Review 33 (2):39-42.
The World of Truth.Sandra B. RosenthaI & Patrick L. Bourgeois - 1994 - Southwest Philosophy Review 10 (2):49-58.
Can Truth Be an Event and Still Be Truth?Peter Fristedt - 2008 - Southwest Philosophy Review 24 (1):125-131.
A Solution to the Paradox of Inquiry.John-Michael Kuczynski - 1998 - Southwest Philosophy Review 14 (2):125-138.
The bearer of truth and falsity.Mark Roberts - 1994 - Southwest Philosophy Review 10 (2):59-67.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
66 (#321,009)

6 months
12 (#301,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew F. Smith
Drexel University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references