Reflections on the Hockney-Falco Thesis: Optical Theory and Artistic Practice in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries

Early Science and Medicine 10 (2):163-186 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One problem facing Hockney and Falco is the lack of evidence among optical sources to support their claim that artists used image-projection by the early 1400s. After all, if quattrocento artists knew about image-projection, they must have learned about it from experts in the field, and no one was more expert at the time than Perspectivist opticians. As I argue in this paper, however, Perspectivist reflection-analysis posed certain theoretical and conceptual constraints that would have prevented Perspectivist opticians from recognizing, much less understanding, image-projection. Their silence on this matter is therefore not evidence against the Hockney-Falco thesis.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,607

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
33 (#675,875)

6 months
7 (#673,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Magnification: How to turn a spyglass into an astronomical telescope.Zik Yaakov & Hon Giora - 2012 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 66 (4):439–464.
Binocular vision and image location before Kepler.Robert Goulding - 2018 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 72 (5):497-546.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references