On knowing which thing I am

Philosophy 79 (310):591-608 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Russell's Principle states that in order to think about an object I must know which thing it is, in the sense of being able to distinguish it from all other things. I show that, contra Strawson, Evans and Cassam, Russell's Principle cannot be applied to first-person thought so as to yield necessary conditions of self-consciousness. Footnotes1 Thanks to Naomi Eilan, Keith Hossack, Lucy O'Brien and Ann Whittle for helpful comments.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
148 (#153,840)

6 months
24 (#130,287)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joel Smith
University of Manchester

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description.Bertrand Russell - 1918 - In Mysticism and logic. Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. pp. 152-167.
Who Is I?Eros Corazza, William Fish & Jonathan Gorvett - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 107 (1):1-21.
On the Nature of Acquaintance.B. Russell - 1914 - Philosophical Review 23:590.

Add more references