Kleene's proof of g¨odel's theorem

Abstract

There is a familiar derivation of G¨ odel’s Theorem from the proof by diagonalization of the unsolvability of the Halting Problem. That proof, though, still involves a kind of self-referential trick, as we in effect construct a sentence that says ‘the algorithm searching for a proof of me doesn’t halt’. It is worth showing, then, that some core results in the theory of partial recursive functions directly entail G¨ odel’s First Incompleteness Theorem without any further self-referential trick.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

On Rudimentarity, Primitive Recursivity and Representability.Saeed Salehi - 2020 - Reports on Mathematical Logic 55:73–85.
Incompleteness and jump hierarchies.James Walsh & Patrick Lutz - 2020 - Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 148 (11):4997--5006.
Godel's theorem in retrospect.Martin Tabakov - 1984 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 13 (3):132-134.
Naming and Diagonalization, from Cantor to Gödel to Kleene.Haim Gaifman - 2006 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 14 (5):709-728.
Other Proofs of Old Results.Henryk Kotlarski - 1998 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 44 (4):474-480.
Heterologicality and Incompleteness.Cezary Cieśliński - 2002 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 48 (1):105-110.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-03-13

Downloads
43 (#518,702)

6 months
43 (#106,500)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Eldridge-Smith
Australian National University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references