From the Phenomenon of the Ellipse to an Inverse-Square Force: Why Not?

In David B. Malament (ed.), Reading Natural Philosophy: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics. Open Court. pp. 31--70 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review of Reading Natural Philosophy: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics. [REVIEW]Chris Smeenk - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (1):194-199.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
84 (#250,231)

6 months
9 (#495,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

George E. Smith
Tufts University

Citations of this work

Do Newton’s rules of reasoning guarantee truth … must they?Quayshawn Spencer - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (4):759-782.
The transcendental method from Newton to Kant.Robert DiSalle - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):448-456.
Newton's Principia.Chris Smeenk & Eric Schliesser - 2013 - In Jed Z. Buchwald & Robert Fox (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of physics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 109-165.
On Newtonian Induction.Ori Belkind - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (4):677-697.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references