- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Film art, argument, and ambiguity
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (1):33–42 (2006)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Film spectatorship: A reply to Murray Smith.Richard Allen - 1998 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56 (1):61-63.
SMITH, MURRAY. Film, Art, and the Third Culture: A Naturalized Aesthetics of Film. Oxford University Press, 2017, xiii + 294 pp., 32 b&w illust., $45.00 cloth. [REVIEW]Katherine Thomson-Jones - 2018 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 76 (3):356-359.
Murray Smith. Film, Art, and the Third Culture: A Naturalized Aesthetics of Film. Reviewed by. [REVIEW]Iris Vidmar - 2018 - Philosophy in Review 38 (3):123-125.
Murray Smith (2017) Film, Art, and the Third Culture: A Naturalized Aesthetics of Film.Will Kitchen - 2021 - Film-Philosophy 25 (1):83-86.
Smith, Murray. 2017. Film, Art, and the Third Culture: A Naturalized Aesthetics of Film. [REVIEW]David Andrews - 2018 - Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture 2 (1):133-136.
Murray Smith, Engaging Characters: Fiction, Emotion, and the Cinema.Alex Neill - 1999 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57 (1):88-88.
Introduction.Murray Smith & Thomas E. Wartenberg - 2006 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (1):1-9.
Collaboration in the Third Culture.Stacie Friend - 2018 - Projections: The Journal for Movies and Mind 12 (2):39-49.
Is Psychology Relevant to Aesthetics?Sherri Irvin, Bence Nanay, Elisabeth Schellekens & Murray Smith - 2019 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 56 (1).
Art and morality: On the ambiguity of a distinction.Morris Grossman - 1973 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 32 (1):103-106.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
130 (#169,354)
6 months
13 (#262,790)
2009-01-28
Downloads
130 (#169,354)
6 months
13 (#262,790)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Are There Definite Objections to Film as Philosophy? Metaphilosophical Considerations.Diana Neiva - 2019 - In Christina Rawls, Diana Neiva & Steven S. Gouveia (eds.), Philosophy and Film: Bridging Divides. New York: Routledge Press, Research on Aesthetics. pp. 116-134.
Happy-Go-Lucky Revisited: A Response to Basileios Kroustallis.Christopher Grau - 2015 - Film-Philosophy 19 (1):1-15.
Noël Carroll.Maisie Knew - 2008 - In Paisley Livingston & Carl R. Plantinga (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Film. New York: Routledge. pp. 196.
References found in this work
The expression of feeling in imagination.Richard Moran - 1994 - Philosophical Review 103 (1):75-106.
The wheel of virtue: Art, literature, and moral knowledge.Noel Carroll - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (1):3–26.
Beyond mere illustration: How films can be philosophy.Thomas E. Wartenberg - 2006 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (1):19–32.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-2w72m uwo