Determinism and prepunishment: the radical nature of compatibilism

Analysis 67 (4):347-349 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I shall argue that compatibilism cannot resist in a principled way the temptation to prepunish people. Compatibilism thus emerges as a much more radical view than it is typically presented and perceived, and is seen to be at odds with fundamental moral intuitions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
218 (#117,268)

6 months
25 (#125,941)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Saul Smilansky
University of Haifa

References found in this work

Time and Punishment.Christopher New - 1992 - Analysis 52 (1):35 - 40.
The Time to Punish.Saul Smilansky - 1994 - Analysis 54 (1):50 - 53.
Punishing Times: Reply to Smilansky.Christopher New - 1995 - Analysis 55 (1):60 - 62.

Add more references