A Natural Interpretation of Aristotelian Teleology

Dianoia The Undergraduate Philosophy Journal of Boston College:67-88 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aristotle famously claimed that all substances are affected by final causes, but what exactly he meant by this is contested. Some maintain that Aristotle held final causes could be wholly explained in terms of other types of causes, whether they be material, formal, or efficient. Others believe that Aristotle restricted the scope of final causality to the biological domain such that inorganic matter would not be subject to the influence of final causes. Still others hold that Aristotle believed the final cause of the cosmos was mankind. In contrast to all these interpretations, this essay argues that Aristotle sees final causes as a unique form of causation that affects all natural substances, including the natural elements in addition to biological life, by leading them to their predefined ends as opposed to any human purpose that they may serve.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,583

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references