Getting the Message and Grasping it: the Give-and-Take of Discourse

Philosophia 47 (1):207-224 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Can one fully succeed in performing illocutionary acts addressed to others if they do not understand what one is purportedly saying? Can one, for example, tell others something if they do not understand what one supposedly said? It is not uncommon for speech act theorist to claim that one cannot. I, in contrast, will be arguing that it is possible for a speaker to fully succeed in performing interpersonal illocutionary acts even if addressee understanding of what is said is not produced, is not intended to be produced and is even intended not to be produced.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Re: the rhetic.Martin Kaså & Felix Larsson - 2023 - Synthese 202 (2).
Illocution by example.Leo Townsend & Jeremy Wanderer - 2023 - Synthese 202 (1):1-22.
Illocution and understanding.Guy Longworth - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Austin vs. Searle on Locutionary and Illocutionary Acts.Indrek Reiland - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Clarifying illocutionary force.Jeremy Wanderer - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-04

Downloads
1,677 (#9,509)

6 months
131 (#43,194)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

How to do things with words.John L. Austin - 1962 - Oxford [Eng.]: Clarendon Press. Edited by Marina Sbisá & J. O. Urmson.
Inquiries Into Truth And Interpretation.Donald Davidson - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Reference and definite descriptions.Keith S. Donnellan - 1966 - Philosophical Review 75 (3):281-304.
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.William P. Alston - 1970 - Philosophical Quarterly 20 (79):172-179.
Speech Acts.J. Searle - 1969 - Foundations of Language 11 (3):433-446.

View all 16 references / Add more references