On the ambiguity of concept use in commentaries

Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 31 (2):115-125 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, we respond in general and specific terms to the commentaries written on our target article . In so doing, we revisit the motivation for our initial article and attempt to clarify certain aspects of our argument. Given that we were taken by some to be trying to undermine the Representational Theory of Mind , we discuss RTM in some detail. We also discuss Wittgenstein's methods and their relevance to the issues raised in our article and in the commentaries. 2012 APA, all rights reserved).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reductionism in retreat.Denny Borsboom, Angélique O. J. Cramer & Annemarie Kalis - 2019 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42:e32.
A better philosophy for a better psychology: Comment on Slaney and Racine (2011).Edouard Machery - 2011 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 31 (2):90-95.
Harming Children to Benefit Others: A Reply.Heidi Malm & Mark Christopher Navin - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):W1-W6.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-23

Downloads
26 (#892,543)

6 months
9 (#328,796)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references