Why Are Definitions True?

Southwest Philosophy Review 7 (1):27-34 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

08972346

DOI

10.5840/swphilreview1991713

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Skidmore on Properties.Reinaldo Elugardo - 2004 - Southwest Philosophy Review 20 (2):189-193.
Taking Heidegger for True.Mark Painter - 2007 - Southwest Philosophy Review 23 (2):13-16.
Why Hegel?Frank Schallow - 1990 - Southwest Philosophy Review 6 (1):29-35.
Is Knowledge Merely True Belief?Arthur Skidmore - 1993 - Southwest Philosophy Review 9 (1):71-76.
Why Submit to Punishment?Jacob Adler - 1988 - Southwest Philosophy Review 4 (1):127-128.
Why Pragmatists Should be Rawlsians.Robert B. Talisse - 2013 - Southwest Philosophy Review 29 (1):71-78.
Why Nietzsche Was So Wise.Andrew Burnside - 2021 - Southwest Philosophy Review 37 (2):45-48.
Why is There a Problem with Moral Dilemmas?Juha Räikkä - 1996 - Southwest Philosophy Review 12 (2):189-206.
On Sartwell’s Thesis That Knowledge is Merely True Belief.Art Skidmore - 1997 - Southwest Philosophy Review 13 (1):123-127.
Why Individual Identity Matters.Mark T. Brown - 1990 - Southwest Philosophy Review 6 (1):99-104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
27 (#832,152)

6 months
8 (#605,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references