Duties to animals: The failure of Kant's moral theory

Journal of Value Inquiry 35 (4):541-559 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Indirect Duties to Animals.Wilson Scott - 2002 - Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (1):17-27.
Duties regarding animals.Patrick Kain - 2010 - In Lara Denis (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 210--233.
Kant's Account of Our Moral Obligations Concerning Animals: Animals in Kantian Ethics.Zaid Mir - 2019 - University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research Journal 5 (1):8.
Kant and Moral Responsibility for Animals.Helga Varden - 2020 - In John J. Callanan & Lucy Allais (eds.), Kant and Animals. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press. pp. 157-175.
Kant's concept of indirect duties and environmental ethics.Milene Consenso Tonetto - 2017 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 16 (3):519-532.
Kantianism for Animals.Nico Dario Müller - 2022 - New York City, New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
149 (#153,025)

6 months
10 (#422,339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Skidmore
Idaho State University

References found in this work

Two distinctions in goodness.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (2):169-195.
Two Distinctions in Goodness.Christine Korsgaard - 1997 - In Thomas L. Carson & Paul K. Moser (eds.), Morality and the good life. New York: Oxford University Press.

Add more references