Selective Conscientious Objection and the Prima Facie Duty Override Criteria

Journal of Military Ethics 22 (2):103-109 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Selective conscientious objection, a refusal to participate in a specific war due to reasons of conscience, has recently gained attention. A combatant confronted with such a decision needs guidance to help decide whether and how to object. Furthermore, those judging a combatant’s objection or failure to object need guidance. After introducing the prima facie duty override criteria, I will apply the criteria to the case of selective conscientious objection. Ultimately, I argue that the jus ad bellum criteria rebranded as the prima facie duty override criteria can help provide guidance regarding selective conscientious objection.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,804

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-15

Downloads
38 (#659,099)

6 months
5 (#868,391)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Logan Sisson
United States Air Force Academy

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Just and Unjust Wars.M. Walzer - 1979 - Philosophy 54 (209):415-420.
Professional Integrity and Disobedience in the Military.Jessica Wolfendale - 2009 - Journal of Military Ethics 8 (2):127-140.
Sincerity, accuracy and selective conscientious objection.Mark Navin - 2013 - Journal of Military Ethics 12 (2):111 - 128.

View all 9 references / Add more references