Are Moral Beliefs Truth‐Apt?

In Moral skepticisms. New York: Oxford University Press (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter discusses expressivism as a form of moral skepticism that denies the truth-aptness of moral beliefs and judgments. It focuses on whether expressivists can solve the problem of embedding by allowing that some moral beliefs have a minimal kind of truth, and whether expressivists can account for the apparent objectivity of moral beliefs. It concludes that if expressivists succeed in mimicking all apparently realistic moral language, then expressivism does not really matter to moral epistemology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Defense of Descriptive Moral Content.Jeff Wisdom - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (3):285-300.
Expressing Moral Belief.Sebastian Hengst - 2022 - Dissertation, Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München
Disciplined syntacticism and moral expressivism.James Lenman - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):32–57.
Moral skepticisms.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Explaining Disagreement: A Problem for (Some) Hybrid Expressivists.John Eriksson - 2015 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (1):39-53.
Classy Moral Pyrrhonism.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2006 - In Moral skepticisms. New York: Oxford University Press.
Are Any Moral Beliefs True?Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2006 - In Moral skepticisms. New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
8 (#1,571,206)

6 months
7 (#673,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references